SBC101 case

PDF Link below

 URI’s Case Study

Grameen Bank: A Case Study in Social Engineering for Microfinance

Nguyen, C. D. H., Tran, T. T. V. and Nguyen, N. Q. N.


The study examines the national setting as well as the difficulties impoverished people and women have in getting loans. It draws attention to Grameen Bank’s distinctive lending model and achievement in offering loans to over 9 million borrowers with a repayment rate of over 97%. The research also talks about the criticism that Grameen Bank has received for its high interest rates and exclusive concentration on lending to women. The success of Grameen Bank served as an inspiration for the development of comparable microfinance institutions throughout the world. According to the study’s findings, Grameen Bank is an effective illustration of how social engineering may solve challenging societal issues and enhance people’s quality of life.


  1. Introduction

Muhammad Yunus, an economist and social entrepreneur, established Grameen Bank in Bangladesh in 1983 (Yunus, 2003). To help the disadvantaged, especially women, start and expand their own companies, the bank offers small loans. Since it has given loans to over 9 million borrowers with a repayment record of over 97%, Grameen Bank has established a reputation as one of the most effective microfinance organizations in the world (Grameen Bank, 2021). The bank’s distinctive lending model, which is based on social capital and trust, has sparked the development of other microfinance organizations throughout the world.


But Grameen Bank is more than just a prosperous microfinance company. It is also a potent example of social engineering because it tackles a critical social issue by developing a brand-new loan system that prioritizes the requirements of underprivileged people and women. As a result, Grameen Bank has aided in improving economic prospects, generating jobs, and assisting families in escaping poverty. In this case study, we’ll look at how Grameen Bank employed social engineering to tackle a significant societal issue and how its distinctive lending model contributed to achieving successful social and economic outcomes.


  1. Literature review

A crucial instrument in the fight against poverty is microfinance, the practice of giving modest loans and other financial services to those with low incomes (Kabeer, 2005). Muhammad Yunus established the Grameen Bank in 1983, and it is recognised as one of the most effective microfinance organizations in the world. The bank’s distinctive lending model, which is based on social capital and trust, has sparked the development of other microfinance organizations throughout the world.


The effects of microfinance on poverty alleviation, economic growth, and women’s empowerment have been the subject of several studies. In Bangladesh, where Grameen Bank is founded, microfinance significantly improved household income and consumption levels, according to a research by Khandker (1998). Similar to this, a study conducted in 2010 by Rahman and Rahman discovered that microfinance has a favorable effect on Bangladeshi women’s economic empowerment.


Other research has explicitly looked at the effect of Grameen Bank. According to a 1996 research by Hashemi et al., women who got loans from Grameen Bank had greater economic prospects and were more inclined to participate in household decision-making. According to Khandker’s (1999) research, Bangladeshi borrowers’ income and consumption levels, as well as social indices like health and education, improved as a result of Grameen Bank’s lending programme.


Despite some criticism of microlending as a strategy to combat poverty, particularly in light of high interest rates and worries about excessive debt (Morduch, 1999), Grameen Bank has remained a leading example of socially conscious lending. The bank is a potent example of social engineering for microfinance because of its singular focus on the needs of the poor, especially women, and its reliance on trust and social capital.


Overall, the research points to Grameen Bank’s lending strategy as having a beneficial effect on Bangladesh’s poverty reduction and economic empowerment, especially for women. Lessons from Grameen Bank can help other microfinance organizations and social enterprises trying to address serious social issues through creative lending methods, as microfinance continues to be a crucial instrument in the battle against poverty.


  1. Barriers to Credit Access in Bangladesh

Prior to the founding of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, it was extremely difficult for many individuals, especially the poor and women, to obtain credit. Small farmers and business owners found it challenging to obtain financing since conventional banks frequently demanded collateral or a certain amount of income. Women’s mobility and decision-making power are frequently restricted by institutional and cultural practices, which makes it further harder for them to get finance. Before Grameen Bank was founded, there were several obstacles to obtaining credit in Bangladesh. This article will analyze those obstacles and present pertinent statistics to back up the topic.


Small farmers are extremely important to Bangladesh’s food supply, and the economy of the nation has historically been heavily focused on agriculture. Small farmers, however, have historically had a difficult time getting financing from traditional banks. Only 6% of Bangladesh’s small farmers had access to institutional financing during the beginning of the 1970s, according to a study by the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (Khandker, 1998). The survey also discovered that one of the biggest obstacles to the country’s agricultural development was a lack of access to loans.


Similar difficulties were also encountered by small business owners in obtaining finance, particularly those in rural areas. Since small business owners frequently lacked the income or collateral necessary to receive loans, the conventional banking system was not created to meet their needs. Only 9% of owners of small businesses had access to institutional finance in the early 1970s, according to a survey by the Bangladesh Small and Cottage Industries Corporation (Khandker, 1998).


In Bangladesh, women had to overcome additional obstacles to get credit. Women’s mobility and decision-making abilities were frequently constrained by institutional and cultural practices, making it challenging for them to establish creditworthiness and obtain loans. When they did have access to credit, women also faced discrimination and paid higher interest rates than men. Only 2% of rural women had access to institutional finance in the early 1970s, according to a research by the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (Khandker, 1998).


For Bangladesh’s poor and women, the lack of access to finance had significant social and economic repercussions. Small company owners and farmers were unable to invest in their enterprises because they couldn’t get loans, which reduced their production and income levels. The lack of access to credit had a particular impact on women because it reduced their economic options and kept them in the margins.


The absence of collateral was one of Bangladesh’s major obstacles to obtaining credit. Many small farmers and business owners found it extremely difficult to acquire loans from conventional banks since they had to put up collateral. It was challenging for them to acquire financing because they frequently lacked any assets that could be used as collateral. Furthermore, the traditional banking system was created to meet the requirements of bigger companies, which frequently had the collateral needed to receive loans.


The absence of a documented credit history in Bangladesh was another obstacle to credit access. Prior to receiving loans, traditional banks frequently required borrowers to establish a documented credit history. It was challenging for many small company owners and farmers to demonstrate creditworthiness and acquire access to loans since they lacked a formal credit history.


Access to credit was also significantly hampered by institutional and cultural norms, particularly for women. Women frequently lacked the mobility and decision-making capacity to prove their creditworthiness and obtain loans. Further limiting their economic options were cultural norms that frequently precluded women from participating in economic activity.


Access to loans in Bangladesh was also significantly hampered by a lack of infrastructure and knowledge. It was challenging for many small company owners and farmers to locate the right sources of finance because they lacked access to information about the available loan options. Moreover, it was challenging for borrowers to acquire credit due to the absence of infrastructure, particularly in rural areas.


  1. Muhammad Yunus’ Vision for a New Kind of Lending System

The introduction of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh has revolutionized the lives of the underprivileged and women who were previously shut out of the traditional banking system. Grameen Bank, a microfinance organization founded in 1983 by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, offers small loans to the underprivileged, primarily women, who would not otherwise have access to credit. This article will explore how Grameen Bank is being used in Bangladesh and will include pertinent information to back up the topic.


Due to the underprivileged and women’s lack of access to finance in Bangladesh, Grameen Bank was founded. Its goal is to offer scalable and sustainable financial services to the underprivileged, especially women. The foundation of Grameen Bank is microfinance, which includes giving modest loans to those who wouldn’t otherwise have access to credit. Borrowers must return the loans with interest and must typically utilize them to launch or grow a small business.


The focus on women is one of the distinctive characteristics of Grameen Bank. The majority of Grameen Bank’s customers are women, and the bank has significantly contributed to the empowerment of women in Bangladesh. Women made up 97% of Grameen Bank borrowers in 2012, according to a World Bank research (World Bank, 2013). The survey also discovered that Grameen Bank significantly influenced Bangladeshi women’s economic and social empowerment.


The impoverished in Bangladesh have been successfully reached by Grameen Bank. Bangladesh’s poverty rate decreased from 56.7% in 1991–1992 to 20.5% in 2018, according to the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2019). This drop was significantly influenced by Grameen Bank, which gave the underprivileged access to credit, allowing them to launch or grow their enterprises and elevate their economic standing.


The group-based lending methodology used by Grameen Bank is one of its fundamental characteristics. Each borrower in a group of five is accountable for paying back the loans made to them by the other members. High repayment rates and low default rates have been achieved by this model. In 2013, 95% of Grameen Bank loans were repaid, according to research by the International Food Policy Research Institute (Islam et al., 2014). The group-based lending strategy, according to the study, had a favorable effect on the borrowers’ social networks and financial situation.


Beyond finance, Grameen Bank has had success diversifying its offerings. It provides a variety of financial services, such as remittance, insurance, and savings accounts. As of June 2019, Grameen Bank had more than 8.9 million borrowers and 22.5 million depositors, according to a research done by the Bangladesh Bank (Bangladesh Bank, 2019). The survey also discovered that Grameen Bank significantly impacted Bangladesh’s financial inclusion.


Finally, the introduction of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh has been a notable success. Poor people, especially women, who were previously shut out of the traditional banking system, now have access to credit and other financial services. Grameen Bank has significantly contributed to the empowerment of women and the reduction of poverty.



  1.  Challenges faced by Grameen Bank

Other than the low credit availability in Bangladesh, the Grameen Bank encountered other difficulties. With customers paying interest on their loans, the bank’s lending programme was created to be self-sustaining. In order for the bank to continue operating, it was necessary for borrowers to have incomes adequate to pay back their loans.


However, the bank has come under fire for its high interest rates and emphasis on lending to women. The bank’s higher interest rates than those of traditional banks have given rise to criticism that they are exploitative and cause borrowers to become too indebted. Furthermore, concerns have been voiced regarding whether the bank’s emphasis on financing to women genuinely empowers them or rather feeds into gender stereotypes (Hossain, 2021).


Additionally, some detractors have said that by offering short-term loans that do not address the underlying causes of poverty, Grameen Bank’s lending programme contributes to the cycle of poverty. Many loans are frequently taken out in the names of male family members or are utilized for domestic expenses rather than business investments, according to some, therefore the bank’s success in lending to women may be exaggerated (Morduch, 1999).


As a result, even while the Grameen Bank’s creative lending programme has received accolades for its positive effects on eradicating poverty and empowering women, it also encountered substantial obstacles and setbacks that must be overcome.


  1. Results of Grameen Bank’s Microfinance System in Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s economic and social development has been significantly impacted by the lending programme of Grameen Bank. The bank has contributed to the development of a new generation of entrepreneurs and job creators by granting impoverished people and women access to financing. According to a World Bank report from 2019, millions of people have been helped by Grameen Bank’s lending initiative to escape poverty by creating their own small companies and earning money.


The innovative lending programme of Grameen Bank has also had a favorable effect on the financial sector. The Kiva Foundation in the US and SKS Microfinance in India are two examples of similar microfinance organizations that were founded as a result of the bank’s success. Due to the institutions’ adoption of the Grameen Bank model of giving small loans to impoverished people and women, these nations now have greater financial inclusion and better economic possibilities (Duvendack et al., 2011).


Grameen Bank has had a tremendous social influence in addition to its economic impact. The bank has defied traditional gender stereotypes by concentrating on female borrowers, empowering women to take an active part in their communities. The financial lives of women borrowers have improved, and many of them have emerged as role models for other women in their communities (Kabeer, 2001).


Millions of individuals now have access to credit thanks to Grameen Bank’s innovative lending model, which has enhanced social inclusion and economic prospects in Bangladesh and worldwide.


  1. Grameen Bank as a Social Engineer

Grameen Bank is a social engineer in that it developed a brand-new lending structure that catered to the needs of poor people and women in order to address an urgent social issue – their inability to get credit. Social engineering is the practice of creating or modifying social structures, institutions, or procedures using theories from social science, psychology, and other disciplines.


To enable group-based lending and give those who were previously shut out of standard lending systems access to credit, Grameen Bank’s innovative lending strategy made use of trust and social capital. This method expanded economic opportunities for people and their families while also enabling people to launch and expand their own enterprises. The success of the bank has also encouraged the development of comparable microfinance organizations throughout the world, highlighting the ability of social engineering to handle complex societal issues and enhance people’s lives.


As a result, Grameen Bank’s creative approach to lending can be seen as a leading example of social engineering because it used social science and psychology principles to develop a new financial system that had a significant impact on lowering poverty and enhancing economic opportunities for underprivileged people and communities.


  1. Conclusion

The lending process at Grameen Bank is distinct in that it is founded on social capital and trust rather than collateral or conventional credit assessment techniques. The bank is built on the idea of group-based lending, wherein borrowers are grouped into smaller groups and each is collectively liable for loan repayment. This strategy has been successful in lowering default rates because it puts borrowers under social obligation to make on-time loan repayments.


Given that it has given loans to nearly 9 million borrowers, many of whom are underprivileged people and women, Grameen Bank has achieved exceptional success. Over 97% of the bank’s loans have been repaid on time or earlier (Hossain, 2021). This is evidence of how well the group-based lending model works in enabling borrowers to take charge of their own financial futures.


Not just in Bangladesh but all around the world, Grameen Bank has had a huge impact. Due to the bank’s success, other microfinance organizations have been founded in other nations, giving millions of people who were previously turned away by traditional lending institutions access to credit. The approach has been modified to fit local situations, and some organizations focus on supporting certain communities, like rural farmers or women.


The success of Grameen Bank and other institutions demonstrates the power of social engineering to solve challenging societal issues. These organizations have been able to provide access to loans and other financial services that were previously out of reach by concentrating on the needs of marginalized communities and making use of trust and social capital. Millions of people now have better economic opportunities thanks to the development of small enterprises, the creation of jobs, and other factors. These kinds of social engineering techniques can be an effective means of bringing about beneficial social change and enhancing people’s lives.


In conclusion, Grameen Bank’s success in giving credit to underprivileged people and women is evidence of the effectiveness of social engineering in solving challenging social issues. The group-based lending approach used by the bank, which is based on social capital and trust, has shown to be successful in giving loans to those who weren’t previously eligible for them. Inspiring the establishment of comparable microfinance organizations all over the world and giving millions of people access to credit and other financial services, Grameen Bank has had a huge impact. This accomplishment is a potent illustration of how social engineering can be utilized to improve people’s lives and bring about beneficial social change.



Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Books. 

Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. PublicAffairs. 

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Statistical Yearbook of Bangladesh 2019. Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. 

Islam, M. R., & Hossain, M. (2017). Factors affecting credit repayment behavior: Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 52(2), 169–184.

Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: a critical analysis of the third millennium development goal. Gender & Development, 13(1), 13-24. 

Nigar, N. (2019). Microfinance in Bangladesh: A critical analysis of Grameen Bank and its role in empowering women. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 6(1), 1-10. 

World Bank. (2021). Bangladesh – Financial inclusion. 

Yunus, M. (2007). Creating a world without poverty: Social business and the future of capitalism. PublicAffairs.